More on Caroline County’s debt: Well, actually Mr. Chairman…

Floyd Thomas at the October 14, 2008, Board of Supervisors meeting (side question: Why does it take the county eight business days to post the Board video?):

[flv:https://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/videos/debt.flv 320 240]

First, several of the jurisdictions surrounding Caroline County — Hanover, Spotsylvania, and Stafford counties, for example — have populations, and corresponding tax bases, that are four to five times higher than Caroline.

Second, Caroline County’s current debt is $58,366,658 (that’s just principal) with a projected debt service of $92,630,740 (that would the total payment for the principal and interest). The current proposal is to borrow more money, which would mean the county would owe $68,557,505 in principal, with a total debt service of $108,621,556.

Third, Caroline County’s $58 million of debt and King George County’s $64 million, Orange County’s $53 million, Powhatan County’s $84 million, and Warren County’s $100 million of debt — and their ability to handle the debt — are completely different.

King George County is the only one of those named counties that has a lower population and a lower tax base than Caroline County.

As for the others:

For 2007, the United States Census Bureau provided the following population estimates:

  • Caroline County: 27,282
  • Orange County: 32,492 (19% more than Caroline)
  • Powhatan County: 27,817 (2% more than Caroline)
  • Warren County: 36,294 (33% more than Caroline)

In 2005, according to the 2008-2010 Composite Index (PDF), the counties had the following assessed true value of property (a measure of total property values in the county):

  • Caroline County: $3,397,577,423
  • Orange County: $4,339,437,441 (28% more than Caroline)
  • Powhatan County: $3,013,552,182 (11% less than Caroline)
  • Warren County: $4,890,626,882 (44% more than Caroline)

Also in 2005 (Ibid), the counties had the following adjusted gross income in the county:

  • Caroline County: $511,932,206
  • Orange County: $735,062,134 (44% more than Caroline)
  • Powhatan County: $684,856,006 (34% more than Caroline)
  • Warren County: $800,320,331 (56% more than Caroline)

Again, in 2005 (Ibid), the counties had the following taxable retail sales:

  • Caroline County: $94,767,567
  • Orange County: $183,939,921 (94% more than Caroline)
  • Powhatan County: $119,543,492 (26% more than Caroline)
  • Warren County: $224,505,469 (137% more than Caroline)

I think those counties are a heck of a lot more able to handle their debt than Caroline County…

My thoughts on Emmett Snead’s proposed gravel/sand pit in the Rappahannock Academy area (Clark’s Cut).

Right now, there’s a pending special exemption permit request going before the Caroline County Board of Supervisors that would allow a gravel/sand extraction (primarily sand extraction) on property located on Route 17 south of its intersection with Pepmeier Hill Road. The public hearing on the permit is scheduled for October 28th.

The land is owned by local farmer and small business owner Emmett Snead, who lives and works adjacent to the property.

Another gravel pit (mostly gravel at that location), called Hayfield, is located a hundred yards down the road just on the north side of the intersection with Pepmeier Hill Road. Hayfield was originally approved way back in 1972, without the terms and conditions that are present in the currently proposed permit.

Since I first heard about Snead’s gravel/sand pit several months ago, I’ve gone from opposing it, to being on the fence, to now supporting it.

One of the reason I’m now supporting the permit is due to the antics of the folks at “Friends of Tidewater Trail”, who oppose the permit. Some of the folks in the organization are so insane that they seem to think that gravel trucks are targeting them for assassination and trying to run them off the road constantly.

Seriously.

And if they’re not acting like bullies at a constituent meeting, they’re buying fear-mongering ads in the local rag (The Caroline Progress). Let me break this down into paragraph-by-paragraph analysis: [color in original]:

DON’T LET A DEADLY TRAGEDY HAPPEN IN THE TIDEWATER TRAIL CORRIDOR!

Last week, on September 30 at 7:25 AM, a Culpeper school bus was struck broadside by a pick-up truck on Route 3 near Lignum. Several of the 39 students aboard were taken to the hospital and treated for minor injuries. Both vehicles sustained extensive damage. But, it could have been much worse.

What does a gravel truck in Caroline County have to do with a school bus in Culpeper County? Even an ambulance chaser of a lawyer would have trouble finding causality between those two.

Imagine if it had been a fully loaded gravel truck weighing 60,000 pounds that hit the school bus instead of the pick-up weighing 4,000 pounds. The outcome would have been devastating. Who was at fault would be unimportant. Anguished mothers and fathers would be asking themselves how such a thing could happen. Could it have been prevented? But then, of course, it would be too late.

Wow, a 60,000 pound truck. I’ve only had one problem with gravel trucks, and that was getting behind two that were driving slowly one day.

Frankly, I’m more concerned about the 100,000 pound plus farm trucks that are carrying corn or soybeans. At least the people driving the gravel trucks are required to have a commercial driver’s license (CDL), unlike the farmers, which aren’t required by Virginia law to have a CDL (DMV, Code of Virginia § 46.2-341.4).

I’ve been in vehicles that have been run off the road by farmers. Will the Board starting requiring a special exemption permit for farming, so that I have a say as the vehicles on the roadway that affect me?

What about those bloody trash trucks on the road? Are we going to lock down Caroline County and let only those that have a permit drive on our roads?

What about those constant slow moving cars and SUVs that I get behind? I say we don’t let them into the county anymore.

By the folks at “Friends of Tidewater Trail”‘s standards, I can dictate exactly what vehicles end up on the road. It can be damned the property the people own, the taxes those folks pay, or the people they employ.

And as one volunteer fire and rescue person has said, at least he knows what to expect when he has to respond to a truck that’s involved in an accident. He said he doesn’t know what to expect with some of the folks commuting back and forth to Hampton Roads.

On Tidewater Trail in Caroline County, we face the same dangers every day when we have over 400 heavy trucks on a narrow, two-lane highway intermixed with school buses from all the local public schools, St. Margaret’s School, and Fredericksburg Christian School as well as more than 5,000 cars and pick-ups. Most of the major industrial truck traffic occurs during peak hours when all of the schools buses are stopping to pick up or drop off students and thousands of commuters are going to or coming from work.

What a lie! Since when did St. Margaret’s School — which is located in Tappahannock and is primarily a boarding school, for crying out loud — run school buses into Caroline County? And Fredericksburg Christian only runs school buses to Bowling Green, which isn’t located on Tidewater Trail the last time I checked.

The only school bus that operate in that area are two from Caroline County Public Schools. And they turn a 100 feet down the road from the proposed location of the gravel pit onto Pepmeier Hill Road.

And most of the gravel truck traffic doesn’t occur during the peak hours. You might have one or two trucks early in the morning taking stuff that wasn’t moved from the previous day’s work wherever it has to go; but most of the truck traffic is going to occur as the gravel is being removed from the ground. And that has to occurred when the workers are there, which is during the middle of the day. Duh.

VDOT has no authority over the approval of truck traffic that begins or ends in the Rte 17 corridor. Only the Caroline County Board of Supervisors does. They alone have the authority to approve special exception use permits for sand and gravel mines — or deny them. The new mine applying for a permit from the board on October 28 would add 120 heavy gravel trucks to Rte 17 in addition to the more than 400 trucks driving up and down the corridor today. Thats a 30% increase in truck traffic, if you can imagine. The next applicant for a mine would add another 200 more heavy trucks. And there are several mines lined up behind them. If any of them would be approved, you and your children would be lined up behind their trucks, or worse.

The 120 trucks from Clark’s Cut would only result in a miserly 2.3% increase in traffic on Tidewater Trail.

And what the next applicant does is irrelevant. Special exemption permits — just like rezonings — are supposed to be assessed and approved or denied on a case-by-case basis.

As a community, we have the luxury of stopping a major tragedy from happening — before it happens. If you are concerned, please take the time to e-mail, write or call your supervisors and let them know that we do not want public safety to be further jeopardized by approving more mines and trucks in the Tidewater Trail corridor. There are many reasons that gravel mines should never be permitted in the corridor, but none is more important than protecting the safety and welfare of our fellow citizens and our children.

Frankly, after reading that ad, I’m waiting for someone to yell out “Won’t someone please think of the children?” a la Helen Lovejoy on The Simpsons.

Their opposition can basically be summed up at this: “If the Board approves the permit, THEY’RE TRYING TO KILL YOUR KIDS!!11!!!!1”

Of course, for the folks at the “Friends of Tidewater Trail”, it’s more about them being able to control what other people do with their property.

If they could provide some credible opposition to this permit, I might still be opposing the permit. But alas, they can’t.

Here are some reasons to support the permit:

As part of the terms and conditions offered by Snead, he will provide $0.10 per ton of material removed for “for road improvements along the U.S. Rt. 17 corridor.” The estimated yield for the site is 2,000,000 tons, which means the county would be getting approximately $200,000. Snead has proposed giving $100,000 upfront to the county when the permit is approved, with the other $100,000 in five years when the permit has to go through renewal.

And when VDOT gets around to widening Route 17 to four lanes, Snead has offered a dedicated right-of-way to the state for road expansion on the property as part of the terms and conditions.

Snead has also offered to barrier the property well above and beyond what county ordinance and policy requires. Since there is an eagle currently nested on some of the trees by the river at the proposed location, Snead has gone so far as to agree to plant trees in that area that are used for nesting by prey of eagles, so the eagle has plenty to eat!

When the mining operation is done, which should take about seven years, the area will be reclaimed and now that the sand can has been removed, a vineyard or berries (blueberries, strawberries, raspberries) will be grown on the property. Current crop yields on the property are low already due to the existing sand and gravel. The depression resulting from the removal of the sand and gravel will be used as an irrigation pond:

The property shown on the proposed extraction area is extremely sandy and has a very thin topsoil layer. The field is subject to the slightest summer drought and Mr. Snead has experienced several crop failures in recent years. His hopes are to extract sand from the field, lower the elevation and create an irrigation pond in the center of the field. Topsoil as it becomes available (a by-product of commercial development at 1-95 & US Route 17 & US 1 area) will be back hauled to the extraction area and mixed with the sandy overburden (topsoil) along with Mr. Snead’s personal blend of compost. This topsoil blend will then be spread back over the disturbed areas in the reclamation process and produce a productive farm field. It is Mr. Snead’s intent to produce vegetable crops in this area, including grapes, blackberries and raspberries.

And here are some extras:

While I’m on the subject of government debt: Caroline County on its way to being $108,621,556 in debt.

That’s $4,090.13 of debt per citizen.

On June 30, 2008, the county was $92,630,740 in debt with $58,366,658 of that debt being principal and $34,264,082 being the interest.

50.579% ($46,851,746) of the debt was general government related while 49.420% ($45,778,993) was school related.

The county is in the process of refinancing some school related debt via the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) as well as borrowing more money for capital improvement projects (more on those projects below). With the new and restructured debt, the county would then be $108,621,556 in debt and the county wouldn’t finish paying off that debt until 2034.

All this debt would push the county to their established maximum debt policy ceiling (which is 12% of total general fund expenditures and school expenditures) for the 2010 and 2011 fiscal years. They would be close to the maximum debt policy ceiling for the 2012 fiscal year as well.

And remember the county is (supposedly) seriously considering borrowing another $4,500,000 next year to expand the County Park at Milford. The county still lacks a public safety building, a new school for the Bowling Green area, as well as a public works workshop. That’s what we call “priorities” folks.

Here are the projects that are being borrowed for this fiscal year, along with some editorial comments:

  • North Anna Boat Access — $50,000 — Wasn’t the State Fair of Virginia supposed to be paying for this as part of their proffer agreement?
  • Dawn Library — $765,000 — The Dawn Library has been in the works for a couple years but it could have probably have waited. Some of the costs for the library were reduced due to the fact that Maxie Rozell donated land for construction.
  • Welcome Signs — $40,000 — We have a massive budget deficit and they want to borrow money for welcome signs? What the heck…
  • County Park — $70,000 — We all know how Percy Ashcraft is obsessed with parks…
  • Farmer Mini Park – B.G. — $75,000 — Again…
  • Dawn Mini Park — $25,000 — And again…
  • Ladysmith Convenience Site Expansion — $100,000 — Needed from what I understand.
  • Radio System — $60,000 — Needed.
  • EMS Equip CC Ambulance #1 — $54,000 — Not needed. This item is supposed to be equipment for an ambulance running out of the proposed Carmel Church Fire Station. All the other equipment — including the station itself — were removed from the budget except for this item. I even e-mail Percy Ashcraft telling him this item shouldn’t be in the budget several months ago; good to see he’s paying attention.
  • Replacement Defibrillators — $31,164 — Needed, presumably.
  • Ladysmith VRS – Replace Unit #229 — $120,000 — Needed, presumably.
  • Frog Level VRS Generator — $42,500 — The rescue chief wanted his leaking roof fixed but instead he’s getting a generator!
  • BG VFD Replacement Air Compressor – Squad 1 — $17,000 — Needed, presumably.
  • Ladysmith Fire Truck — $39,678 — That amount is only to finish paying for the truck. The rest was paid for in the previous fiscal year. I bet the fine folks in Port Royal wish they would get a new truck since theirs was supposed to be replace 10 years ago.
  • Police Vehicle/Equipment — $464,100 — Needed, presumably.
  • Upgrade Sound System CCCSC — $95,000 — Needed, but that’s a lot of money.
  • Roll-Off Truck Replacement #2 — $140,000 — Not a 100% sure what this is. :)
  • Replace Compactor/Dawn — $24,000.
  • Replace Compactor Caroline High School — $20,000.
  • Clerk Computer System — $47,000 — A grant from the Virginia government was originally supposed to pay for this but I doubt that’s going to happen now with all the state budget cuts.
  • Circuit Court Security Area Modifications — $61,593 — Needed badly to improve security in the holding cells. Remember the Circuit Court deals with felons, folks.
  • IT Budget — $140,000 — Maybe they will fix the county’s terrible e-mail server.
  • Roll off Truck — $135,000.
  • 116 units from Municipal Emergency Services — $535,106

Total: $3,151,141

Source: All these numbers are from the Caroline County, Virginia Capital Fund Analysis dated September 23, 2008, prepared by Davenport & Company LLC.

Correction/Clarification: Kathy Beard misquoted by The Caroline [Lack of] Progress.

Kathy Beard, the Director of Tourism, was [mis]quoted as stating that the county received $1,600,000 in taxes from the transient occupancy tax (TOT) in 2007 by The Caroline Progress.

Gary Wilson’s response to an e-mail seeking a comment about that claim:

Mr. Watson,

Thanks for your questions regarding the impact of the tourism industry in Caroline County.

The report discussed during the meeting reflected the tourism revenue impact dollars in Caroline for 2007. These numbers are supplied by the Virginia Tourism Corporation and have been tracked throughout Virginia for years. These numbers were not presented as any type of county budget indicator, as they only monitor the income produced by the industry within the jurisdiction.

This table reflects the Caroline County section of the report:

County ($ Millions) ($ Millions) (Thousands) ($ Millions) ($ Millions)
2007 (preliminary) State Tax Local Tax
Expenditures Payroll Employment Receipts Receipts
CAROLINE 70.21 9.78 0.56 3.44 1.61

Caroline County collects transient occupancy taxes at a rate of 5% per each lodging occurrence. These are the only funds that support the Tourism program for the county. The local tax receipt figure reported above by the state for 2007 are a combination of lodging, meals, sales, fuel, and several other types of taxes, generated by that activity, not the amount of funds dedicated to the tourism budget in Caroline County.

Again, thank you for your inquiry regarding the tourism impact in Caroline. Although we will certainly see a decline in these revenue numbers due to the slowing economy, we hope tourism in Caroline County will continue to play an important role in new revenue spreading throughout the county.

Source: http://www.vatc.org/research/2007VACountyEstimates.xls

In English, Director Wilson is stating the Ms. Beard referenced the fact that the Virginia Tourism Corporation estimates the county received $1,6100,000 in taxes from tourism related industries. That would be seen in sales tax, gasoline taxes, and other taxes including TOT.

My follow-up:

Are you stating that Ms. Beard was misquoted by The Caroline Progress?

His response:

Ms. Beard was indeed misquoted.

Reporter at The Free Lance–Star ignores the fact that the Henrico County Finance Director said the State Fair brings no money into their county.

In what could only be a paid advertisement masquerading as a news story, The Free Lance–Fish Wrap talks about how the State Fair will be bringing in gazillions of dollars into the county:

Screams from thrill-seekers echo over the State Fair of Virginia’s midway as one ride–the Extreme–wavers from side to side, above the crowds.

Music blasts from various games and vendor booths, while the scent seeps out of a tent housing freshly prepared turkey. Visitors to the rabbits, geese and other caged animals point excitedly and take pictures.

These are the rides, animals, sounds and food the fair will offer next year in Caroline County–but will the screams and crowds follow?

State Fair and county officials hope so.

[blah, blah, blah]

If the lazy “reporters” at The Fish Wrap had bothered to read the Richmond Times-Dispatch yesterday, they would have seen this great gem in a story about the fair (H/t: Tom James):

Henrico won’t suffer financial losses from the fair’s departure, said John Vithoulkas, the county’s finance director. Tax revenues from the fair, which draws about a quarter million visitors each year, are minimal. “It’s just a blip,” he said.

The State Fair of Virginia is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Most of its activities are exempt from income taxes because of its mission to promote agriculture and education.

Yeah, the State Fair is a nonprofit, but its president, Curry Roberts, makes more than $200,000 for working 60 hours a week.

At least that’s what he tells the IRS.

Did Caroline County lose track of $1,300,000 in tax revenue? Correction/Clarification: Kathy Beard misquoted by The Caroline [Lack of] Progress.

Read the follow up post.

The original post can be read below in its original form:

That, or our astute tourism manager doesn’t know how much money tourism brings into the county (The Caroline Progress):

Kathy Beard, County Director of Tourism, spoke about the role tourism plays in county economics. Beard stated that more than $70 million dollars were spent on tourism related industry in Caroline in 2007, and $1.6 million came back to the county in the form of transient occupancy taxes.

$1,600,000 in transient occupancy taxes (TOT) — that’s the hotel tax for the uninitiated — in 2007?

Let’s see, according to the proposed FY07-08 budget (p. 193), in the second half of the 2007 calendar year, the county only brought in $150,719 in TOT.

Assuming that the county brought in the same amount during the first half of the ’07 calendar year (probably not, but let’s assume), that means a total of $301,438 during the whole calendar year.

So, that leaves three possibilities (I’m leaning towards option #2):

  1. The county “lost” $1,300,000 in tax revenue.
  2. Kathy Beard doesn’t know jack about how much money comes into the county, and decided to claim a figure more than five fold higher than the actual number.
  3. She was misquoted (always a possibilities with The Caroline [Lack of] Progress).

In other funny stuff from the Economic Development Office, you gotta love the fact that the e-mail link to Director Gary Wilson that is on the Economic Development Office’s homepage doesn’t even work.

How bad is it for an Economic Development Office to not even have a functioning e-mail link to the Director?

Caroline County government: We don’t have to tell you where your money is being spent.

Here’s a copy of an e-mail that I sent to County Administrator Percy Ashcraft on September 25th:

Dear Mr. Ashcraft,

What was the total cost of adopting the ordinances that vacated Saddlehorse Farms and the other subdivision owned by the Farmers?

This request for information includes, but is not limited to: the cost for advertising the public hearing, any cost for legal services by the county attorney (not asking for the privileged work of the county attorney, just the cost), as well as the waiver of fees to the Farmers for the Planning Commission hearings that had to be conducted.

When will the county be taking action against the other six (or more) subdivisions that were identified to also be in violation of the subdivision code? Surely the Board does not intend to selectively and vindictively prosecute one person.

-Tim

Here’s the response I received from the county attorney, Benjamin Emerson, via snail mail today [emphasis mine] (PDF link):

Dear Mr. Watson:

As I believe you are aware, this firm and I represent Caroline County as its County Attorneys. Your e-mailed request for information to Mr. Ashcraft was referred to me for response as a request under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”).

Your e-mail inquires as to the cost of adopting certain ordinances vacating the Saddlehorse Farms subdivision and other subdivisions being developed by the Farmers, and includes other questions.

Among other things and with certain exceptions and limitations, FOIA requires that public records of public bodies be open and made available to citizens of the Commonwealth for inspection upon request being made for such records with reasonable specificity. It does not require the public body to compile records, to create records that do not exist, or to respond to questions in general that are not requests for specific documents or existing records.

Because your inquiry consists of questions to which you have requested answers, it is not subject to FOIA.

Sincerely,

[signed]

Benjamin W. Emerson

Well, the county just managed to get their butts sued over this issue.

And for the record, anyone think that payments made to The Caroline Progress aren’t public records?

I guess the judge in Caroline County General District Court will be deciding that.

My comments to the Caroline County Board of Supervisors at their September 23rd meeting.

At the September 8th, 2008, meeting of the Caroline County Board of Supervisors, the board approved the following item on their consent agenda: Adoption of a Resolution that Revises the June 24, 2008 Budget Resolution to Incorporate Errors and Omission that Were Approved by the Board during Budget Discussions.

Item #2 in the resolution was the following:

Davenport [& Company LLC, the firm hired to help with preparing this year’s budget] learned after the June 24, 2008 Budget Resolution adoption that in July 2007 the Board adopted an increased in the Board of Supervisors’ salaries. Therefore this was not included in the original Budget Resolution.

The resolution stated that this would have the following impact on general fund expenditures:

[…] 1) a $25,518 [possibly a typo and should be $23,518 -ed.] increase in the Board of Supervisors budget to compensate for the increase in the Board’s salaries […]

$23,518 increase. That accounts for a $4,703.60 increase per supervisor. That’s a 26.43% increase in pay compared to last year.

Meanwhile, members of the county staff only received a 2% salary increase this year. So, unless someone on the county staff makes $235,180, not only did the Board receive a bigger percentage increase, the Board also received a bigger net increase as well compared to anyone on county staff.

This pay increase was approved after the tax rate in county was increased by $0.05/$100 during a sagging economy. This pay increase was approved after the supervisors learned there was a $755,321 shortfall from the last fiscal year.

To make this matter even worst — as if that was possible — the board a hour and half later later told the Ladysmith Volunteer Fire Department that the Board and the county had no idea where they would find the money necessary to finish paying for a fire truck.

The cost to finish paying for the fire truck? $25,000 to $30,000 dollars.

Those aren’t the only problems with the pay increase.

According to the summary for the consent agenda item, this pay increase was approved by the Board in July 2007.

However, § 15.2-1414.2 of the Code of Virginia requires a pay increase such as this to be adopted “prior to July 1” of the year that the board will be up for election:

Prior to July 1 of the year in which members of the board of supervisors are to be elected or, if the board is elected for staggered terms, of any year in which at least forty percent of the members of the board are to be elected, the current board, by a recorded vote of a majority present, shall set a maximum annual compensation which will become effective as of January 1 of the next year.

The last I checked a meeting in July isn’t “prior to July 1”.

Thank you for your time.

They didn’t have anything to say about that, by the way.

Good job ignoring the fact that Jeff Sili violated the Code of Virginia. And other stupidity from this week’s BOS meeting.

What, that’s the second or third time, right? It’s hard to keep track.

The Caroline County Board of Supervisors approved the rezoning of Belmont North 3–2 on Tuesday night. Supervisors Bobby Popowicz, Maxie Rozell, and Chairman Floyd Thomas voted to approve while Supervisors Wayne Acors and Jeff Sili voted against the rezoning.

Wayne Acors had his reasons (too much development in that area already); but Jeff Sili employed a logical fallacy (imagine that!) of a slippery slope argument stating that, “if we approve Belmont North, we have to also approve this 600 house subdivision working its way through the planning commission!”, instead of addressing Belmont North on its own merits.

As Chairman Floyd Thomas pointed out, the Code of Virginia requires that a rezoning/special exemption request or permit be accessed individually and on its own merits. To do otherwise is a violation of the Code of Virginia.

Here’s how The Free Lance–Fish Wrap wrote it up:

Supervisors Wayne Acors and Jeff Sili argued the board should not be creating more home sites when it has thousands of unbuilt residential lots and more development proposals in the pipeline.

Actually, Wayne Acors did not argue the second point. If you had paid attention, you would heard him say he thought there was too much development in that area already and not that were any other rezoning applicants coming forward.

[…]

He [Jeff Sili] also referenced another rezoning request by a different developer for more than 600 homes that is under review by the Planning Commission.

Sili noted that while he should consider the proposal based on its own merits, he was looking at the bigger picture, including other proposals.

“I don’t think we can fool ourselves by saying we are looking at one development,” he said.

[…]

[Chairman Floyd] Thomas [who represents the district the proposed rezoning is in] said he was going to look at the proposal individually. He noted tangible benefits to the county, such as the fire station.

“I can’t worry about what the next project or the next development is,” he said.

[…]

[Bobby] Popowicz said the Sealys went “above and beyond” to make their proposal attractive to the county.

To say the least.

The county’s stated proffer policy is $17,632.36 per house.

The Sealys proffered over $12,800,000 (if I remember the number correctly) for Belmont North which is a 530 home development. That’s over $24,150 per house. That’s 36% more than the county’s stated policy!

Included in that proffer is the land for, and the design and the construction of a new fire station that must been completed within 30 months.

There’s the 20 acres for the school at a mutually agreed upon location with the Sealys providing soil testing to the county for free.

Improvements to the roads in the area.

Berms and barriers next to existing land owners above and beyond the county’s stated policy on berms and barriers.

Prepayments to the county’s utility system that will pay for the borrowing on the infrastructure for the system for the next three years.

But that’s too technical for The Fish Wrap to mention, after all, they had to make space in that story for the important and pressing information that golf carts can now be used on public roads in the Caroline Pines subdivision.

Yeah, folks, that’s the hard news coming out of the Caroline County Board of Supervisors meeting this week.

So, which Caroline County Supervisor is leaking information from closed session meetings of the Board of Supervisors?

A couple months ago, a Caroline County citizen raised objections regarding the Caroline County Board of Supervisors, Caroline’s Promise, and Caroline’s Promise’s faith based initiatives. Separation of church and state and all that.

Feel free to argue amongst yourself as to whether you agree with Caroline’s Promise’s policies and programs or not, but that’s the topic of discussion for another post.

Here’s the topic of this post, however: If you heard over to the Caroline County forum on that waste-of-electrons known as FredTalk, you will see people taking about what the Attorney General said in an legal opinion that was provided to the Caroline County Board of Supervisors during a closed session meeting.

This opinion should be covered under closed session meeting standards, as well as under attorney/client privilege, and not be discussed with members of the public.

The opinion which information was leaked from was an informal/unofficial opinion that the Board requested to see if there were any problems that needed to be rectified immediately.

The Board has also requested an official, formal opinion that will be released to the public in the future, which hasn’t finished being prepared at this point.

County Administrator Percy Ashcraft has confirmed that a leak has occurred and stated that the leak didn’t come from anyone on the county staff.

He pointed out that there were only eight or nine people in the room. Three or four people were county staff: Percy Ashcraft; the county attorney; the deputy county administrator, and possibly Ashcraft’s administrative assistant (she skips the closed sessions sometimes due to the fact that no minutes have to be kept for closed sessions).

None of these persons have the position or reason to leak this information. The County Administrator’s Office would be smart enough not to discuss anyone without the proper “clearance”, and the county attorney should understand the principles of attorney/client privilege.

So, folks, who does that leave?

Well, those five lovely folks on the Board of Supervisors.

Now, which member of the Board of Supervisors has connections to that waste-of-electrons known as FredTalk?

Why, that would be Jeff Sili. His wife loves to post on that forum using the alias “oharascarlett” and is bestest buddies with the persons talking about the information contained in the legal opinion.

Not only that, but isn’t Susan Sili on the Board of Directors of Caroline’s Promise? Why, yes, I believe she is.

Sidebar: Anyone else see a conflict of interest in the Board of Supervisors appropriating money to an organization that is being ran by family members of the supervisors?

Of course, this isn’t the first time that confidential information has been leaked from the Board of Supervisors.

The last time around, it was Susan Sili posting about who would be hired for a job — nine days before there was an official announcement!

The person who was hired? A good friend of the Silis!

If I’m not mistaken, it’s against the law to leak information from a closed session. Even if it isn’t against the law, it’s a violation of the Board’s attorney/client privilege.

Has the Board of Supervisors launched an inquiry into this matter?

Are criminal charges being pursued at this point? Impeachment? Censure? Etc.