<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Wow, Catherine Crabill is certainly a constitutional scholar.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/2009/11/16/wow-catherine-crabill-is-certainly-a-constitutional-scholar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/2009/11/16/wow-catherine-crabill-is-certainly-a-constitutional-scholar/</link>
	<description>&#34;Agitate, agitate, agitate!&#34; -Frederick Douglass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:27:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Catherine Crabill: Calls blogger &#8220;wicked&#8221;, refers to his parents as &#8220;Ahab and Jezebel&#8221;, and calls for demons to be cast out of them. &#124; On The Right		</title>
		<link>https://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/2009/11/16/wow-catherine-crabill-is-certainly-a-constitutional-scholar/comment-page-1/#comment-25744</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Catherine Crabill: Calls blogger &#8220;wicked&#8221;, refers to his parents as &#8220;Ahab and Jezebel&#8221;, and calls for demons to be cast out of them. &#124; On The Right]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/?p=2877#comment-25744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] you.T. Watson: No, we know something about the law, it&#8217;s not very —you know— hard. Kinda like treason being defined in the Constitution.The 70 seconds it took for Crabill to think of a comeback, as well as her coming up with nothing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you.T. Watson: No, we know something about the law, it&#8217;s not very —you know— hard. Kinda like treason being defined in the Constitution.The 70 seconds it took for Crabill to think of a comeback, as well as her coming up with nothing to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nancy Stanley		</title>
		<link>https://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/2009/11/16/wow-catherine-crabill-is-certainly-a-constitutional-scholar/comment-page-1/#comment-22729</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Stanley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 16:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/?p=2877#comment-22729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is now obvious to me from listening to the entire speech (approx. 17min) by Catherine Crabill at the tea party WHY you aren&#039;t linking to it as your claim above is flat out wrong, inaccurrate and misleading to those who will blindly read and trust what you write in your posts without searching for verification. However, every individual should not believe everything they read, hear or say WITHOUT a sincere and, at times, time-consuming search for the truth.  Verify the facts.  Because if you don&#039;t and you pass on a statement that is not true then you are part of the problem.

You wrote above:

&quot;If you watch the whole thing (get your link, I am not linking to the Daily Kos), you will see a portion where says that if elected politicians violate their oaths of office (by disagreeing with her politically), they should be tried for treason.&quot;  
 
One of the problems is where you paranthetically suggest that it is &quot;by disagreeing with her politically&quot;.  The English language is plain.  Videos don&#039;t lie as long as they&#039;ve not been edited.  For you to really have listened to the entire speech in CONTEXT you would not be espousing the opinion and/or lie that you are now.  You have an agenda: that is to destroy the credibility/character of another individual with whom you do not agree.  It is your character and credibility is what I suggest your readers call into question.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is now obvious to me from listening to the entire speech (approx. 17min) by Catherine Crabill at the tea party WHY you aren&#8217;t linking to it as your claim above is flat out wrong, inaccurrate and misleading to those who will blindly read and trust what you write in your posts without searching for verification. However, every individual should not believe everything they read, hear or say WITHOUT a sincere and, at times, time-consuming search for the truth.  Verify the facts.  Because if you don&#8217;t and you pass on a statement that is not true then you are part of the problem.</p>
<p>You wrote above:</p>
<p>&#8220;If you watch the whole thing (get your link, I am not linking to the Daily Kos), you will see a portion where says that if elected politicians violate their oaths of office (by disagreeing with her politically), they should be tried for treason.&#8221;  </p>
<p>One of the problems is where you paranthetically suggest that it is &#8220;by disagreeing with her politically&#8221;.  The English language is plain.  Videos don&#8217;t lie as long as they&#8217;ve not been edited.  For you to really have listened to the entire speech in CONTEXT you would not be espousing the opinion and/or lie that you are now.  You have an agenda: that is to destroy the credibility/character of another individual with whom you do not agree.  It is your character and credibility is what I suggest your readers call into question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Catherine Crabill: Constitutional scholar. &#124; On The Right		</title>
		<link>https://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/2009/11/16/wow-catherine-crabill-is-certainly-a-constitutional-scholar/comment-page-1/#comment-20462</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Catherine Crabill: Constitutional scholar. &#124; On The Right]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 06:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/?p=2877#comment-20462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Crabill: Constitutional scholar. Posted on March 26th, 2010 by Timothy WatsonNo, not really. I have previously posted on her inability to read the very short Article III of the United States Co... now it looks she&#8217;s missed a whole amendment:Additionally, we must repeal the income tax. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Crabill: Constitutional scholar. Posted on March 26th, 2010 by Timothy WatsonNo, not really. I have previously posted on her inability to read the very short Article III of the United States Co&#8230; now it looks she&#8217;s missed a whole amendment:Additionally, we must repeal the income tax. It [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Catherine Crabill: Constitutional scholar. &#124; I&#39;m Surrounded By Idiots		</title>
		<link>https://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/2009/11/16/wow-catherine-crabill-is-certainly-a-constitutional-scholar/comment-page-1/#comment-20461</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Catherine Crabill: Constitutional scholar. &#124; I&#39;m Surrounded By Idiots]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 06:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com/?p=2877#comment-20461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Catherine Crabill: Constitutional scholar. March 26, 2010 &#124; Posted by Timothy WatsonNo, not really. I have previously posted on her inability to read the very short Article III of the United States Co... now it looks she&#8217;s missed a whole amendment:Additionally, we must repeal the income tax. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Catherine Crabill: Constitutional scholar. March 26, 2010 | Posted by Timothy WatsonNo, not really. I have previously posted on her inability to read the very short Article III of the United States Co&#8230; now it looks she&#8217;s missed a whole amendment:Additionally, we must repeal the income tax. It [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 22/38 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk
Database Caching 3/28 queries in 0.028 seconds using Redis

Served from: www.imsurroundedbyidiots.com @ 2026-04-10 16:20:36 by W3 Total Cache
-->