Mr. Cupp has never hidden behind his title, which by the way, comes after his name and not before it. The title you so begrudge him was not awarded lightly and without adversity. I have never known one in the legal profession who has worked as hard to be a bulwark of honesty, decency, and compassion in his profession. I agree with him that the majority of disrespecting “politicos” in the Neck are usually those from whom he and I expect or request none.

It is a shame, however, that Messieurs Spiess, Webb, Kling, and this new “J.C.” require derogatory comments about Mr. Cupp to disagree with his opinions. Never once have I attacked any of these individuals personally, nor have I attacked Ms. Crabill. As far as I can tell, Mr. Cupp has not either outside of the much earlier “tin foil hat” reference. I have merely stated that I feel that her extremist beliefs, questionable ties, lack of experience, and lack of understanding all come together to make her a shoe-in for Mr. Pollard. “If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it must be a duck.” Ms. Crabill has never even been able to demonstrate an understanding of the sphere of influence connected to the post of Delegate for the 99th District House of Representatives. My opinion revolves around my belief in her inability to win, and her inability to handle the position.

Mr. Cupp and I have been quite enthusiastic, contrary to apparent popular opinion, about the tea party movement as a whole. I wonder often, if there had been such polarization in the 1700s within our own party as is evident here, if we’d even have a country to save today. The purely rabid support of one candidate, seemingly without question, is the more dangerous path “J.C.” I recommend you read a definition or two on “groupthink,” via a Google search. Ask yourself if many of our own GOP compatriots aren’t treading down this uneasy path. I have no doubt that Ms. Crabill has been a good mother, a homebody, and what she believes to be a patriot. I have never been proven otherwise. Mr. Cupp and I merely believe that she isn’t the correct choice to defeat Pollard in November. The thought that somehow questioning one’s own party should label you disloyal isn’t only wrong-minded, it’s truly frightening. What have we conservatives become if that is to be the case? What are we but what you claim, “ranting, self-stimulating bullies?”

That I am “not well respected” by the gallery of fools who have lined up to support Ms. Crabill and her half-cocked quest for public office is a badge of honor.

And, as I have said numerous times, I am not against the Tea Party movement generally. Had I not been at the Shad Planking, I had planned on attending the April 15 Tea Party in Heathsville. However, having heard that the event turned into a Crabill rally from my friends who attended and having seen the caliber of folks who “lead” the local branch, I have wisely decided not to become involved with that group.

“J.C.” … Politics is a rough and tumble game. I think it was Harry Truman who said “if you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.” Ms. Crabill had to have known that her far-out (and easily discovered) opinions on a variety of subjects (including the Lancaster Red Devil mascot) would be a source of potential political liability to any effort she made to seek public office. If she didn’t know that, she’s much too naive for the office she seeks.

If you allegedly know me, “J.C.”, you would know that I have never been one to hold my tongue. If you want an advocate for your cause, you don’t need someone who is afraid to speak up.

I will, however, explain that a “secondary boycott” is illegal under federal and state laws. Mr. Spiess has the right to personally boycott any business he chooses, but he does not have the right to recommend that his “membership” do so.

Just a friendly comment so that this doesn’t get truly out of hand.

Way to go, Jim. Spoken like a true gentleman. Thanks, but no thanks, for your “support” (I really want people to “support” me that possess the right to vote) and the support of the misguided rabble who have rallied around you.

“Catherine will win, I guarentee [sic] it.”

Jim, no offense, but the word of a convicted felon and convicted dog killer (regardless of your rambling explanation and the fact that the jury only fined you $1, you still violated that age-old wisdom of “The People’s Court” that you don’t take the law into your own hands) isn’t worth a whole heck of a lot in my book.

BTW… Unlike you, Jim, Larry Thorne is a man of impeccable integrity and good judgment. I’m certain he and Nunnally’s will do just fine.